What are the main phases of the SBTi certification process?
The SBTi certification process has seven stages: registration, commitment, target setting, submission and validation, communication, implementation and reporting, and certification. This framework ensures that companies follow a credible, science-aligned pathway from intention to measurable action. Each phase builds on the last, starting with basic commitments and ending with ongoing tracking and reporting that demonstrates impact.
How do companies select an appropriate base year and prepare their emissions data?
This step is foundational. The base year should be no earlier than 2015 and must reflect normal operations using accurate and verifiable data. Scope 1 and 2 targets must use the same base year, while Scope 3 may differ. Companies must also prepare two full corporate footprints: one for the base year and one for the most recent year, both calculated using consistent methodologies aligned with the GHG Protocol. For companies in sectors like agriculture or land use, additional guidance (e.g., FLAG) applies. Errors here can derail your entire submission, so clarity and consistency are critical.
What are the key requirements when developing and submitting science-based targets?
Companies must use SBTi guidance, tailored to their sector, to set short- and long-term emissions reduction targets. Internal alignment is crucial; targets should be agreed across departments and signed off at the executive level. Submission involves uploading emissions data and targets via the SBTi platform, choosing a review date, and designating a technical contact to respond to queries within two working days. The review process is pass/fail: if your targets align with science, they’re approved. Delays in responsiveness or data gaps can cause setbacks, so being well-prepared is essential.
How do companies implement and report on their approved targets effectively?
Implementation is where targets become real action. Companies must prioritise high-impact emission sources and create a clear roadmap detailing reduction initiatives. A system must be in place to regularly track progress and refine data quality over time. Engaging suppliers and improving primary data, especially for Scope 3, enhances accuracy. Reporting must follow globally recognised frameworks like CDP and GRI to ensure transparency. It’s important to balance ambition with pragmatism: focus resources where they’ll drive the greatest emissions impact, and continually update the plan as business conditions evolve. Strong implementation turns targets into credible climate leadership.
